Export limit exceeded: 22130 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (22130 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8980 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 2 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Bigfix Inventory and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory v9 is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) error when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume all available memory resources. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8977 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 2 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Bigfix Inventory and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory v9 could disclose sensitive information to an unauthorized user using HTTP GET requests. This information could be used to mount further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8967 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 2 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Bigfix Inventory and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory v9 9.2 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8966 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 2 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Bigfix Inventory and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory v9 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8963 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 2 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Bigfix Inventory and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory v9 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8961 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 2 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Bigfix Inventory and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory v9 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, using an open redirect attack. By persuading a victim to visit a specially-crafted Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to spoof the URL displayed to redirect a user to a malicious Web site that would appear to be trusted. This could allow the attacker to obtain highly sensitive information or conduct further attacks against the victim. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8008 | 2 Mcafee, Microsoft | 3 Security Scan Plus, Windows 10, Windows 7 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows 7 and Windows 10 in McAfee Security Scan Plus (SSP) 3.11.376 allows attackers to load a replacement of the version.dll file via McAfee McUICnt.exe onto a Windows system. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0158 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows running on Windows 10, Windows 10 1511, Windows 8.1 Windows RT 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 R2 fails to properly sanitize handles in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2016-7544 | 2 Cryptopp, Microsoft | 2 Crypto\+\+, Windows | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Crypto++ 5.6.4 incorrectly uses Microsoft's stack-based _malloca and _freea functions. The library will request a block of memory to align a table in memory. If the table is later reallocated, then the wrong pointer could be freed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0141 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0159 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows 10 1607, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows 2016 when ADFS incorrectly treats requests coming from Extranet clients as Intranet requests, aka "ADFS Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2016-6914 | 2 Microsoft, Ui | 2 Windows, Unifi Video | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| Ubiquiti UniFi Video before 3.8.0 for Windows uses weak permissions for the installation directory, which allows local users to gain SYSTEM privileges via a Trojan horse taskkill.exe file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6804 | 2 Apache, Microsoft | 2 Openoffice, Windows | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| The Apache OpenOffice installer (versions prior to 4.1.3, including some branded as OpenOffice.org) for Windows contains a defective operation that allows execution of arbitrary code with elevated privileges. This requires that the location in which the installer is run has been previously poisoned by a file that impersonates a dynamic-link library that the installer depends upon. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6803 | 2 Apache, Microsoft | 2 Openoffice, Windows | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An installer defect known as an "unquoted Windows search path vulnerability" affected the Apache OpenOffice before 4.1.3 installers for Windows. The PC must have previously been infected by a Trojan Horse application (or user) running with administrative privilege. Any installer with the unquoted search path vulnerability becomes a delayed trigger for the exploit. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6110 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Tivoli Storage Manager, Tivoli Storage Manager For Virtual Environments Data Protection For Vmware, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager discloses unencrypted login credentials to Vmware vCenter that could be obtained by a local user. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6034 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Tivoli Storage Manager For Virtual Environments Data Protection For Vmware, Windows | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Virtual Environments (VMware) could disclose the Windows domain credentials to a user with a high level of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5918 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Tivoli Storage Manager For Space Management, Windows | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager HSM for Windows displays the encrypted Tivoli Storage Manager password in application trace output if the password access option is prompt and the password is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5725 | 3 Jcraft, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Jsch, Windows, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in JCraft JSch before 0.1.54 on Windows, when the mode is ChannelSftp.OVERWRITE, allows remote SFTP servers to write to arbitrary files via a ..\ (dot dot backslash) in a response to a recursive GET command. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0150 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0151 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, and CVE-2017-0150. | ||||