Export limit exceeded: 28196 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (28196 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-92446 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Guix | 2026-10-21 | N/A |
| `gx_binres_theme_load()` and `gx_binres_font_load()` take the resource as a bare `GX_UBYTE *` with no length, and `GX_BINRES_DATA_INFO` has no field to carry one. Every read is therefore performed at an offset the file itself chose, against a buffer whose extent the loader does not know. A resource that declares more data than it contains is read past its end, and an offset stored in the file is turned into a pointer without being bounded. This is a distinct defect from GHSA-hgcj-22cg-4hfv, which was an underflowed glyph count. It needs no underflow and no wrapped multiply: a perfectly well-formed, narrow glyph range reaches it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91059 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Guix | 2026-10-21 | N/A |
| The GUIX JPEG software decoder enforces no ordering on JPEG markers. A file that places a second `SOF0` frame header after `SOS` re-runs the frame header parser after the output buffer has already been allocated and its geometry latched. The decoder returns `GX_SUCCESS` and publishes a `GX_PIXELMAP` whose reported dimensions and `data_size` exceed the allocation behind it. Any consumer that trusts the returned structure reads out of bounds, including GUIX's own display drivers, reached through the ordinary draw path. Reproduces in the shipped default configuration; `GX_SOFTWARE_DECODER_SUPPORT` is enabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92454 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Guix | 2026-10-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| The GUIX software JPEG decoder reads four kinds of marker segment without checking that each is long enough to hold what it reads. A truncated segment is therefore read past the end of the caller's image buffer. Separately, a zero chroma sampling factor makes the block decode loop non-terminating. Both reproduce in the default configuration, in which `GX_SOFTWARE_DECODER_SUPPORT` is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91057 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Guix | 2026-10-21 | N/A |
| `_gx_multi_line_text_view_display_info_get()` reads one byte past the end of the application's text buffer when the string it is given ends with a carriage return (`\r`). The over-read can also cause callers to advance their index past the end of the string, producing a second over-read in `_gx_multi_line_text_view_string_total_rows_compute()` and a row of text that is not in the source. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9659 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple exploitable stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formFilter functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability deals with the vpnUser parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42019 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup pppoe functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the pppoe_dns1 parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42020 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup pppoe functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the pppoe_dns2 parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40615 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formParentControl deviceName functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41222 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formParentControl url functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41223 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formMapDelDevice macstr functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83860 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows GDI allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83857 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-21 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Windows Universal Disk Format File System Driver (UDFS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83856 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 10 more | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Event Logging Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70106 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70093 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Rich Text Edit Control allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70103 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-10-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Error Reporting allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93888 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Connect Direct | 2026-10-21 | 7.8 High |
| IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114045 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-10-21 | 8.8 High |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.1 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the server-side rdpsnd channel because an integer wraparound in rdpsnd_server_select_format() DVI_ADPCM block-alignment arithmetic bypasses validation. A malicious RDP client can send two SNDC_FORMATS PDUs with an nBlockAlign too small for nChannels, causing an unbounded heap write during server audio playback, potentially enabling code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94184 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| A stack-based buffer overflow flaw was found in fetchmail when built with NTLM support. A malicious or compromised mail server advertising NTLM authentication can send a crafted Type 2 challenge that causes fetchmail to write past a fixed stack buffer while building the NTLM authenticate response. This may lead to remote code execution depending on stack-frame layout, or to authentication failure or process termination under memory hardening. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95507 | 1 Libslirp Project | 1 Libslirp | 2026-10-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read was found in the NC-SI OEM response handler of libslirp. A truncated NC-SI OEM Ethernet frame causes ncsi_rsp_handler_oem() to read up to 4 bytes beyond the supplied packet length and reflect the value into the response sent to the guest, resulting in guest-observable disclosure of adjacent host process memory. | ||||