Export limit exceeded: 11791 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11033 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11033 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-42616 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data, configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks: an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their authenticated session. Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent or awareness. The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41661 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on affected devices due to lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41254 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| STOMP over WebSocket applications may be vulnerable to a security bypass that allows an attacker to send unauthorized messages. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.11 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.23 * 6.0.x - 6.0.29 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.45 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected. MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.12OSS6.1.x6.1.24 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 6.0.xN/A Out of support https://spring.io/projects/spring-framework#support 5.3.x5.3.46 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CreditThis vulnerability was discovered and responsibly reported by Jannis Kaiser. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3997 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in dazhouda lecms 3.0.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /index.php?my-profile-ajax-1 of the component Personal Information Page. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2617 | 1 Hitachienergy | 1 Rtu500 Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability exists in the RTU500 that allows for authenticated and authorized users to bypass secure update, if secure update feature was not enabled on all CMUs of a RTU500. If a malicious actor successfully exploits this vulnerability, they could use it to update the RTU500 with unsigned firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3839 | 1 Gnome | 1 Epiphany | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| A flaw was found in Epiphany, a tool that allows websites to open external URL handler applications with minimal user interaction. This design can be misused to exploit vulnerabilities within those handlers, making them appear remotely exploitable. The browser fails to properly warn or gate this action, resulting in potential code execution on the client device via trusted UI behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12373 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-35981 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor (CWE-359) in the Command Centre Server allows a privileged Operator to view limited personal data about a Cardholder they would not normally have permissions to view. This issue affects Command Centre Server: 9.30.1874 (MR1), 9.20.2337 (MR3), 9.10.3194 (MR6). | ||||
| CVE-2025-34133 | 1 Wimi Teamwork | 1 Wimi Teamwork | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Wimi Teamwork versions prior to 7.38.17 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in its API. The API accepts any authenticated request that contains a JSON field named 'csrf_token' without validating the field’s value; only the presence of the field is checked. An attacker can craft a cross-site request that causes a logged-in victim’s browser to submit a JSON POST containing an arbitrary or empty 'csrf_token', and the API will execute the request with the victim’s privileges. Successful exploitation can allow an attacker to perform privileged actions as the victim potentially resulting in account takeover, privilege escalation, or service disruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31328 | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| SAP Learning Solution is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing an attacker to trick authenticated user into sending unintended requests to the server. GET-based OData function is named in a way that it violates the expected behaviour. This issue could impact both the confidentiality and integrity of the application without affecting the availability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11415 | 1 Meloniq.net | 1 Wp-orphanage Extended | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The WP-Orphanage Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wporphanageex_menu_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to escalate the privileges of all orphan accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26248 | 1 Kademila | 1 Dht | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Kademlia DHT (go-libp2p-kad-dht 0.20.0 and earlier) used in IPFS (0.18.1 and earlier) assigns routing information for content (i.e., information about who holds the content) to be stored by peers whose peer IDs have a small DHT distance from the content ID. This allows an attacker to censor content by generating many Sybil peers whose peer IDs have a small distance from the content ID, thus hijacking the content resolution process. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49965 | 1 Spacex | 1 Starlink Wifi Router Gen2 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| SpaceX Starlink Wi-Fi router Gen 2 before 2023.48.0 allows XSS via the ssid and password parameters on the Setup Page. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50053 | 1 Foundation Platform | 1 Foundation App | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in Foundation.app Foundation platform 1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Web3 authentication process of Foundation, the signed message lacks a nonce (random number) | ||||
| CVE-2023-50923 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." | ||||
| CVE-2023-52212 | 2 Automattic, Wordpress | 2 Wp Job Manager, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WP Job Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Job Manager: from n/a through 2.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52235 | 1 Spacex Starlink Wi Fi Router Gen 2 | 1 Spacex Starlink Wi Fi Router Gen 2 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| SpaceX Starlink Wi-Fi router GEN 2 before 2023.53.0 and Starlink Dish before 07dd2798-ff15-4722-a9ee-de28928aed34 allow CSRF (e.g., for a reboot) via a DNS Rebinding attack. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6492 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Simple Sitemap – Create a Responsive HTML Sitemap plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the 'admin_notices' hook found in class-settings.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin options to a default state via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7065 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Stop Spammers Security | Block Spam Users, Comments, Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2024.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sfs_process AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary IPs to the plugin's allowlist and blocklist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0613 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Delete Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_delete_field() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary post meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||