| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Installation Verification Test (IVT) application in the Install component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.41 and 7.0 before 7.0.0.19 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1308. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM HTTP Server 2.0.47 and earlier, as used in WebSphere Application Server and other products, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving unspecified documentation files in (1) manual/ibm/ and (2) htdocs/*/manual/ibm/. |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the administration console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.41, 7.0 before 7.0.0.19, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the URI. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the backup-archive client in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) 5.3.x before 5.3.6.10, 5.4.x before 5.4.3.4, 5.5.x before 5.5.3, 6.1.x before 6.1.4, and 6.2.x before 6.2.2 on Unix and Linux allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Start Center Layout and Configuration component in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the display name. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| The chaining functionality in the Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA) module in IBM DB2 9.7 before FP6 and 9.8 before FP5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference, and resource consumption or daemon crash) via a crafted request. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in ModuleServlet.do in the Storage Manager Profiler in IBM System Storage DS Storage Manager before 10.83.xx.18 on DS Series devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the selectedModuleOnly parameter in a state_viewmodulelog action to the ModuleServlet URI. |
| The web container in IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.1.x and 6.2.x before 6.2 FP5+Security Pack does not properly perform access control for requests, which allows remote attackers to spoof a localhost request origin via crafted headers. |
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.1.x and 6.2.x before 6.2 FP5+Security Pack allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in the current working directory. |
| IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by establishing many UI sessions within one HTTP session. |
| WebSEAL in IBM Tivoli Access Manager for e-business 6.1.1 before 6.1.1-TIV-AWS-FP0001 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (worker thread consumption) via shift-reload actions. |
| The Application Snoop Servlet in IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0 before 7.0.0.23 does not properly restrict access, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive client and request information via a direct request. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in IBM Eclipse Help System (IEHS), as used in IBM Security AppScan Source 7.x and 8.x before 8.6 and IBM SPSS Data Collection Developer Library 6.0 and 6.0.1, allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| Buffer overflow in ftpd in IBM AIX 5.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long NLST command. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the KPI component in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Administration Console in IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0 before 7.0.0.23 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| Format string vulnerability in the _msgout function in rpc.pcnfsd in IBM AIX 6.1, 5.3, and earlier; IBM VIOS 2.1, 1.5, and earlier; NFS/ONCplus B.11.31_09 and earlier on HP HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, and B.11.31; and SGI IRIX 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an RPC request containing format string specifiers in an invalid directory name. |
| IBM Lotus Notes Traveler before 8.5.1.2 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) by omitting the Internet ID field in the person document, and then using an Apple device to (1) accept or (2) decline an invitation. |
| The Image Viewer component in IBM FileNet P8 Application Engine (P8AE) 3.5.1 before 3.5.1-002 removes a user from an ACL when the user is denied all permissions for an annotation, which might allow remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances. |